
      c1900 - Photograph thanks to Stuart Bowell.
      
    Referenced as having been closed in 1904 when, at the January 1909 Licensing 
		Sessions, the brewery was contending the
    proposed closure of the 
		THREE HORSE SHOES.
		
		However :-
		
		On Friday 10th March 1905, licence renewal was opposed by Superintendent 
		Southgate stating that, including one house about a mile out of town, 14 
		fully licensed houses and one beerhouse. There were also two shop 
		licenses. The population in 1901 was 2,001. This was a fully licensed 
		house, but there were four others within 100 yards and a further three 
		within 150 yards. He believed that the house did good business and was 
		well conducted.
		In support of licence renewal it was said that the house was used by a 
		large number of customers of a class who would not use the nearby 
		houses, which were of a much higher class.
		Trade was given as 126 barrels of beer and 32 gallons of spirits per 
		year. (As repeated in June at the next hearing)
		The Bench adjourned the meeting to inspect the premises and afterwards 
		held a long consultation. Upon return to Court, the Chairman announced 
		that the licence would be referred.
		
		On Friday 23rd June 1905 it was heard that the Renewal Authority had 
		provisionally renewed the licence, but were to refer it to the 
		compensation authority on the grounds that there were an excessive 
		number of licensed houses in proportion to the population, one licence 
		to every 133 persons. The entrances were so arranged as to conduce 
		secret drinking and no other house in Harleston was liable to the same 
		objection on the ground of either sanitary accommodation, size of rooms 
		or general convenience.
		It was said that the sanitary accommodation was the worst of any house 
		in the centre of Harleston.
		Yearly trade was 126 barrels of beer and 32 gallons of spirits.
		For Colchester Brewery Company Ltd., it was said that a fine trade was 
		being carried on but they would do all necessary to modernise the 
		property in order to retain the licence.
		The Committee were of the opinion that the licence must be refused.
		
		At the Harleston Brewster Sessions held Friday 9th February 1906 it was 
		heard that the licence had been referred for Compensation in 1905 and 
		the licence had been extinguished by the Quarter Sessions, however trade 
		was still being carried on.
		In consequence the licence was renewed. 
		
		Also known as the
		SPREAD EAGLE ?
		
		Previously the ROYAL OAK
		to c1896 ?