Licensees : |
DAVID BOWEN |
1858 - 1879 |
Fine of 5s and court costs on Monday 30th August 1858 for having house
open at 10:15 am on the previous Sunday morning. (2 persons drinking) |
Accused January 1859 of selling at illegal
hours on 25th December 1857.
See Opposite. |
22nd August 1878 - Licence renewal granted following disclosure that Mr.
Bowen, although one of three publicans who had purchased goods stolen
from Lowestoft Church, had co-operated with the police. |
WILLIAM
RALPH JAY
& blacksmith |
1881 - 1892 |
Mrs ALICE E
JAY |
1896 - 1901 |
BENJAMIN THOMAS DRUMEE |
1904 - 1908 |
JAMES THOMPSON |
12.01.1909 |
JOHN MILLER |
01.02.1910 |
Convicted
13.09.1912 of permitting drunkenness.
Fine 5/- plus 11/- costs or 7 days detention. |
Cautioned Tuesday 4th
February 1913 for past conviction. |
JAMES BANHAM
(Also at the ALBION
& at the GRIFFIN) |
04.03.1913 |
Mr. PAGE
Manager for J. Banham |
Aug 1913 |
|
64 George Street to 1879
65 George Street in 1883 to 1892
66 George Street 1890, 1896, 1900, 1904 & 1908
Before the Magistrates on Monday 27th January 1859, David Bowen and
eight other licensees, were charged with having their houses open and
permitting persons to drink therein, on Christmas Day and Sunday 26th
December.
Mr. Bowen asserted that he had been advised by a newly enlisted
policeman that the authorities would be lenient over the holiday period.
Although at first denying the claim, the un-named constable later
admitted that his words could have been interpreted that way.
The police constable was ordered to pay the 5s fine and the Mayor gave
notice that he would convict all publicans who were charged with a
second offence of this kind.
On Tuesday 4th March 1913 it was heard that the manager, Mr. Page was
paid 22s a week and allowed a 2½ per cent commission
on all sales. The brewers, Messrs. Lacons, paid all rates and taxes.
The bar was a roomy one, but very dark and gas lights had to run all day. A
room behind was dark and stuffy. The kitchen was a miserable place, dark and
damp and provided with a brick floor. Three rooms upstairs were used, two by
Mrs. Page and one by a lodger.
Altogether the place was badly ventilated, structurally bad and the
accommodation miserable.
Although fully licensed, it was run as a beerhouse.
Within a radius of 300 feet there were eight ale-houses, one beerhouse and
two other licenses. Within 600 feet there were 21 licenses, three on
licenses and five others.
The Chief Constable was asked it it would be better to close the
GRIFFIN
rather than this house since it was also badly ventilated. The Chief
Constable said they were equally bad.
Messrs Lacon said that it was not custom to take two houses from the same
firm in one foul swoop. They would not object to the loss of the
GRIFFIN
since the Free Trade Tavern did good business.
Licence holder, Mr. Banham said his opinion was that the
GRIFFIN
did not supply the want at all and the two houses did a different sort of
trade. He said that the state of the Free Trade Tavern was very fair and the
ceiling heights were higher than many other houses of its class.
Sales for 1910 were 180½ barrels
in 1911, 187½ and
in 1912, 97½
The decline in 1912 being put down to the management.
Average sales were 96 barrels.
Referred to Compensation
Licence renewal refused 11th July 1913.
Licence expired 23rd December 1913
|